Unlike particles in boxes, SHO’s and hydrogen-like ions, almost all problems in quantum mechanics are not exactly solvable. But there are a number of techniques to get sensible, if not exact, solutions for quantum systems. We’ll look at two of these. The first is the Variational Principle in which we guess, and then optimise, a wavefunction in such a way to give an upper bound for the energy levels.
Hydrogen atom can be solved exactly by time independent Schrödinger equation
Other problems aren’t so kind
– Multi-electron atoms
– Molecules
Need to cut some corners
– Approximations
– Astute guesses
We’ll begin with two foundation methods
– Variation method
– Perturbation theory
In practice, modifications / combinations of these two used
Get approximate energy of ground state without solving Schrödinger equation
Gives upper bound for ground state energy
Guess a trial wavefunction, \(\phi\)
– \(\phi\) must be normalisable
– \(\phi\) must satisfy relevant boundary conditions
– Symmetry of problem leads us to \(\phi\)
– Trying to make \(\phi\) as close to what we think the real wavefunction, \(\psi\), is as possible
\(\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \phi^* H \phi \; dx^3 \ge \; E_0\)
(or \(\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \phi^* H \phi \; dx \ge \; E_0\) for 1-D problems)
H is the Hamiltonian, the energy operator for the system
Can be proved by expanding \(\phi\) in terms of the (unknown) true wavefunctions \(\psi\)
Equation above assumes \(\psi\) normalised
In practice, skill in using variation method is astute choice of trial wavefunction
If we happen to chance upon actual ground state wavefunction, \(\psi_0\), then we’ll get an energy = \(E_0\)
Best way to use variation method
– construct trial wavefunction with parameters that can be adjusted
– Minimise value of integral by adjusting parameters
Take particle in one dimensional box, problem we solved exactly before
– Satisfies boundary conditions
– Not normalised yet
– Remember hamiltonian:
\(H = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{dx^2}\)
Remember \(\phi = x(x-L)\) is the trial wavefunction
integral gives us
\(\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \phi^* H \phi \; dx\), but really \(\int_{0}^{+L} \phi^* H \phi \; dx = \frac{\hbar^2 L^3}{6m}\)
to normalise we get \(\int_{0}^{+L} \phi^* \phi \; dx = \frac{L^5}{30}\)
putting together we get:
compare to \(E_1 = \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{2mL^2}\)
agrees to better than 2% (\(\frac{\pi^2}{2} = 4.935\))
Previous example didn’t have adjustable parameters
– In general not the case
Suppose we don’t know solution for SHO problem
Guess that it’s similar to 1-D box we did
\(\phi = \sqrt{ \frac{2}{L} } \sin \frac{\pi x}{L}\) for \(0 \le x \le L\)
need to make box from \(-L \le x \le +L\) by symmetry, and use cosine functions instead of sine
\(\psi(x)= \frac{1}{\sqrt{L}} \cos(\frac{\pi x}{2L})\)
get \(E_0 \le \frac{1}{L} \int_{-L}^L \cos \frac{\pi x}{2L}\left(\frac{- \hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{dx^2} + \frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 x^2\right) \cos \frac{\pi x}{2L} dx\)
\(E_0 \le \frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{8 m L^2} + m \omega^2 L^2 (\frac{1}{6} - \frac{1}{\pi^2})\)
set \(\frac{dE_0}{dL} = 0\) to get minimum of this and find \(L = 1.302 \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{m \omega}}\)
then \(E_0 \le 0.839 \hbar \omega\)
not a great choice of initial wavefunction
but still an instructive result
To find higher energy states, above ground state
– Use trial wavefunctions that are orthonormal to ground state
for example, for the SHO we could use \(\psi_1(x) = A x \cos(\frac{\pi x}{2 L})\)
\(\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} x \cos^2(\frac{\pi x}{2 L}) dx = 0\) because \(x \cos (\frac{\pi x}{2 L})\) and \(\cos (\frac{\pi x}{2 L})\) are orthogonal
Note that while estimations of energy levels can be pretty good, harder to get good picture of wavefunctions from adjusted trial wavefunctions
Variational Method pretty useful for the quantum mechanics of \(He\) and of the \(H_2\) molecule

Physics - Quantum