| Name | Symbol | Mass in amu | Rest Energy (MeV) | Spin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proton | p | 1.007276 | 938.28 | 1⁄2 |
| Neuton | n | 1.008665 | 939.57 | 1⁄2 |
The nucleus is made of protons and neutrons. The stability of the nucleus relies on the short range nuclear force. The models produced can account for the nature and energy of radiation products, the results of scattering experiments, and the range of isotopes across the table of elements. We get a measure of stability, the binding energy per nucleon that peaks around iron.
The natural distance scale for the nucleus is the femtometre (1 fm = 10−15m), the natural energy or mass unit is the mega electron volt (1MeV=1.6×10−13J=1.78×10−30kg)
Nuclei consist of protons and neutrons
masses of nuclei are very nearly integers (when measured in amu)
intrinsic spin (and thus magnetic moment) of nucleus consistent with both neutrons and protons have spin 12
Syntax
Atomic Number ( Z ) is the number of protons in the nucleus.
Atomic Mass ( A ) is the combined number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus.
Also, ( N ) is the number of neutrons, but we use that less often
AZElemente.g.42HehasA=4andZ=2(sometimesjust4He)
how many protons, neutrons in 22688Ra ? How about 56Fe ?
Isotopes are nuclei with the same number of protons but different numbers of neutrons
| Name | Symbol | Mass in amu | Rest Energy (MeV) | Spin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proton | p | 1.007276 | 938.28 | 1⁄2 |
| Neuton | n | 1.008665 | 939.57 | 1⁄2 |
A solitary neutron isn’t stable, decays with half-life of 878s (15 minutes)
Neutrons and protons aren’t point particles (unlike the electron). Have radii of about 0.8fm.
made of quarks
up+23up+23down−13 = proton+1
up+23down−13down−13 = neutron0
Measuring mass in mega-electron volts (MeV)
Makes for a handy unit to measure nuclear energies and masses.
femtometer is natural unit for nucleus
nuclear radii range from 1fm to about 7fm
measure using:
electrons have wavelengths given by:
λ=hcE
diffraction minima at sinθ=1.22×λD
420MeV (λ=2.95fm) electrons give minimum at 50.5∘ for 126C
gives nuclear radius of 2.33fm
From Krane - Introductory Nuclear Physics
The larger the nucleus, the less chance the electron (or in diagram above, muon) has to be in close proximity to a high concentration of charge
mirror nuclei have opposite numbers of protons and neutrons
as far as the nuclear force is concerned, there is no difference between protons and neutrons
but the extra positive charge in 32He carries a Coulomb penalty, which will depend on the average separation of the protons
can measure this energy difference by the maximum energy of positron from β decay
looking within a nucleus, we see temporary assemblages of α particles.
these aren’t static, and collide up against the inner wall of the nucleus frequently
classically they don’t have enough energy to escape, but can get out through quantum mechanical tunnelling
super sensitive to size of barrier, and the energy of this quasi-alpha particle
nuclear densities pretty much all the same
surface a little proton rich
but charge and matter radii of nuclei agree to within 0.1fm
shape pretty spherical, a little oblate. Sometimes.
must be something holding nucleus together, stopping positive protons flying apart
also need to explain radiation
energies of α,β,γ
nuclear half lives
scattering experiments (fire particles at nucleus and see how they bounce off)
which nuclei are stable
behind all this is the Nuclear Force, the left over remnants of the Strong Force
Something has to hold the nucleus together. Some properties of this nuclear force
Epp=14πϵ∘e2r - this is about 1MeV for ~fm separation
in fact, quantum mechanics says it must be even bigger
particle in a box of size of a = 6fm (something like aluminium)
E=3ℏ2π22mpa2≈20MeV
only relevant at fm distances, feeble at greater separations (>3fm)
only effects protons and neutrons, not electrons
agnostic to difference between protons and neutrons
repulsive at short (< 0.5fm) distances
depends on spins of nucleons
no analytic form of nuclear force
FCoulomb=14πϵ∘q1q2r2 or Gμν+Λgμν=κTμν,
but it does have an exponential term
best modelled as an exchange force, mediated by some particle
first analysed by Yukawa
fire a proton at a neutron
it will scatter off in different directions
have to obey conservation of energy and momentum
most will go straight through pretty much
intensity decreases with angle
but too many are scattered at up to 180∘
explained by the proton becoming the neutron and vice-versa
has to be some particle being passed from neutron ⇌ proton
only possible if we borrow energy using the uncertainty principle
ΔEΔt≥ℏ2
Δt given by time taken to cross nucleus at speed of light
Δt≤Rc=3×10−153×108=10−23s
this gives ΔE≈ℏc2×R
gives a particle of about 100MeV (c.f. proton 938MeV, electron 0.511MeV)
eventually discovered the Pion (π∘andπ±), which is made up a quark and anti–quark and has a mass of about 140MeV.
can get a bound state of a single proton and a single neutron, called deuteron (c.f. deuterium, 2H)
something like the equivalent of a hydrogen atom for atomic structure
don’t get proton-proton or neutron-neutron
deuteron has the protons and neutron spins parallel (l=1, triplet)
no excited states of deuteron (unfortunately)
depth of potential well is about 35MeV (remember, E=3ℏ2π22mpa2, for deuteron we measure radius, = a/2, to be 2.1fm)
but separation energy (like ionisation energy) is 2.224MeV
so deuteron only just exists, luckily for us
Next level of complexity moves beyond simple potential well
protons and neutrons moving in orbits within nucleus
energy levels akin to atomic electron energy levels
nuclei with evens numbers of protons and even numbers of neutrons most stable
would like to be able to solve the Schrödinger equation for the nuclear potential, just like we can to solve the electronic levels of Hydrogen
not possible because don’t have a clean equation for the nuclear force/potential
but can use some approximations to get useful results
end up with a ladder of quatum levels (c.f. 1s, 2s, 2p… atomic orbitals)
transitions between levels lead to the emission of light - γ rays
separate suites of levels for protons and for neutrons
Mateusz Sitarz - 2019 thesis - nuclear energy levels for 11650Sn
electrostatic repulsion between protons isn’t nothing
set of magic numbers (a.k.a. noble elements)
Nuclear Valley of Stability (from wikipedia)
Binding Energy per Nucleon of 238U
(938.272×92+939.565×146−221743)/238=7.372MeVpernucleon
B/A rises rapidly through the lightest elements
hits a maximum of ~8.75 MeV around 56Fe
decreases gradually beyond that
if we can turn elements into 56Fe, from either direction, we can release energy
made of five terms
an positive volume term proportional to A given by aνA
a negative surface term given by −asA−23
a negative Coulomb term depending on the number and separation of the protons. Given by −acZ(Z−1)A−13 (again, remember the radius)
a negative symmetric term favouring equal numbers of protons and neutrons, especially for light nuclei. Given by −asym(A−2Z)2A
a positive pairing term favourising even numbers of protons / neutrons. Let’s call this term just δ
Binding Energy Equation
B=aνA−asA−23−acZ(Z−1)A−13−asym(A−2Z)2A+δ
δ=±apA−34 “+” for Z/N even/even “-” for Z/N odd/odd else 0
a good fit for:
aν=15.5MeV
as=16.8MeV
ac=0.72MeV
asym=23MeV
ap=34MeV
1MeV=1.6×10−13J=1.78×10−30kg
Radius=1.2×3√A in femto-metres (1 fm = 10−15m)
BindingE.pernucleon=938.272×Z+939.565×(A−Z)−(massinMeV)A
B=aνA−asA−23−acZ(Z−1)A−13−asym(A−2Z)2A+δ

Nuclear Physics